AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Bluegriffon display comments12/27/2023 The last stable version was released in 2007. KompoZer, a community-developed fork of the NVU editor with WYSIWYG support along with side-by-side editing. A few of these include:Īmaya, an editor by W3C last updated in 2012, which features support for HTML 4.01. Many are still capable choices, if a little dated. There are other projects that have fallen by the wayside, but still have dedicated followings of their own, despite not having seen new releases in the past few years. While a follow-up project (Aloha Editor 2) was discontinued, Aloha Editor is still being actively developed. Here are some you should consider.Īloha Editor is a JavaScript-based WYSIWYG HTML5 editor that allows users to edit content in the same layout that readers view it. Proprietary tools are still common, but there is a rich collection of open source alternatives out there. And those content management systems? They still need templates to function.Īnd though many helpful libraries exist to standardize and simplify the web development process, coding for the web isn’t being displaced any time soon. Every software as a service application, every social media network, and even many mobile applications rely on HTML and CSS to render their display. But as the web moved from a collection of content to a platform for applications, just as many new opportunities have arisen for doing markup. Did it eliminate the need to hand code HTML? Well, for some people, yes. So did the rise of the content management system change the web? Absolutely. You could easily make a functional website without even worrying about the underlying markup. Content management systems like Drupal and WordPress (and many, many others before them) displaced the need for the average content producer to need to edit raw HTML at all. These web authoring tools weren’t just about WYSIWYG editing even for those who were comfortable with direct authoring of markup language, these tools offered advantages with template control, file management, and simply reducing the time it takes to create functional code.īut just as these helpful editors were expanding access to webpage creation, something else was happening too. Among the more successful was Macromedia (later Adobe) Dreamweaver, which was among my personal favorites for many years. Products like CoffeeCup, HotDog, FrontPage, GoLive, and many others filled the market, and many web-based WYSIWYG editors emerged as well. While some designers developed workflows completely based around manual editing of raw HTML files, the WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) editor began to emerge as a tool of empowerment to millions of amateur and professional designers who didn’t know, or at least hadn’t mastered, the art of hypertext markup. It was tough, and before CSS really took hold and became well supported across most common browsers, it often involved hacking a layout together by using HTML tables in a way they were never really envisioned to support. Not all that many years ago, pretty much every webpage on the Internet was, at some level, designed painstakingly by hand.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |